Best try on Chrome browser.
Female ejaculate, the creamy white stuff, is different from squirt. It comes from the Skene’s gland. Squirt comes from the bladder (1).
Squirt, in an absurdly overly technical sense, relevant exclusively to scientific levels of precision, is arguably a form of urine (1). However, it has been shown by studies to have dramatically reduced urine chemicals to the point that we can’t even detect that it is urine without lab equipment. It can be over 99% water. It is generally clear, odorless, and tasteless (1, 2, 3). This leads to most people who experience it believing that it cannot be urine at all (1, 3). It also typically contains PSA (female come), and normal urine usually does not (4).
Calling them the same thing is just confusing and requires long explanations to figure out what is actually being spoken of.
For these reasons we should always delineate squirt as the fluid that is almost entirely water, is generally odorless, tasteless, and clear, and is produced by arousal and orgasm by some women. And we should always delineate urine, or pee, as the yellow, disgusting smelling, foul tasting fluid released in the bathroom.
That said, a woman who is not a natural squirter, or who doesn’t empty right before , might just release normal urine during . That is not squirt.
Squirt requires a specific physical arousal response. A deeply aroused woman’s bladder, who emptied just before arousal, will fill with basically just water, extremely rapidly, when she is turned on (1, 3). This likely also explains some studies that found squirt to be completely normal urine. The women in the studies probably weren’t turned on enough, or didn’t empty right before becoming aroused. Thus they failed to produce squirt, and they just orgasmed, and peed normal pee, and it was erroneously called squirt.
What we call squirt proper is what is reported by the majority of people who have experienced it to be clear, odorless, and tasteless, or to not smell, taste, nor look like urine (1). This cannot possibly describe normal urine. Hence, any study that found ostensible squirt to be totally normal urine clearly wasn’t studying actual squirt in the first place. They were studying normal urine. The studies that actually have ensured tight controls on timing, bladder emptying, and arousal found dramatic reductions in urine chemicals, because they were studying proper squirt (1, 3).
But shouldn’t we just call it diluted urine then?
A cup of properly made, dark, black coffee will have a dramatically higher level of caffeine and other chemicals than an exceedingly weak cup that was made improperly, and poured through the machine with only trace grounds in it, and so was generally odorless, tasteless, and clear. If anyone was served a cup of improperly made coffee like this, they’d never agree that it was, in fact, coffee. Even if we could demonstrate that, on a chemical level, it went through the coffee machine, and made contact with some leftover grounds in there, and so has some coffee chemicals in it. Even if a scientific study declared that this fluid was coffee, no one would ever agree with that. If it’s generally odorless, tasteless, and clear, it’s not coffee. It went through the machine too fast, didn’t make contact with enough grounds, and doesn’t have enough coffee chemicals to be called coffee.
Squirt is the same. Yes, it is fluid from the bladder, but it is produced so rapidly that it comes out as just water, and only tiny traces of urine chemicals it came into contact with on the way through.
Could a woman who drinks a lot of water dilute her urine by overhydrating and just pee, and that would be identical to squirt?
No, because a woman who is unaroused, and is overhydrated, will gradually produce urine at the normal, slow rate. Its chemical levels will be however diluted by the hydration. However, if she is intensely aroused, she will extremely rapidly produce a fluid that is even more reduced in chemicals than whatever her diluted urine would be. The production of each liquid is the result of distinct physiological states. Intense arousal causing rapid fluid production, with dramatically reduced chemical content, is the dividing line. Hence, squirt will always be further reduced in chemicals than urine, regardless of hydration level.
Further, drinking more and more water could never catch up to the reductions caused by squirt. This is because drinking too much water is very dangerous, and can be fatal. Squirt cannot be perfectly imitated by overhydrated urine due to this very real cap on hydration levels.
Also, the diluted urine, produced unrelated to arousal, would typically not contain PSA, and squirt usually does.
Thus, diluted urine will never be the same as squirt.
Finally, the assertion has been made that a squirt fetish is identical to a pee fetish. This is false. First, the motivations are completely different. A pee fetish is frequently about the profane and taboo, or power dynamics. People who enjoy pee frequently like to simply watch a woman on the toilet. They also might enjoy the yellow color, and the strong smell and taste of it, too. Even further, they may be excited by their dislike of these things. They may see these things as gross, and that being what turns them on. They may also enjoy a woman peeing completely unrelated to arousal and . They may also enjoy the sight, smell, taste or feel of pee alone, just the fluid itself, removed from everything.
In stark contrast, squirt enthusiasts, without a pee fetish, are typically excited by the woman’s arousal and orgasm. They wouldn’t even be interested in it if it were separated from arousal and . The squirt represents physical manifestation of her pleasure and excitement. Squirt is not usually about power dynamics, and it is certainly not about being profane or taboo. They wouldn’t want to watch her urinate in the toilet, and if a woman released foul smelling, yellow urine during , a squirt enthusiast wouldn’t even consider that to be squirt in the first place. The squirt being experientially inoffensive to them, and not being identical to a waste product, is a huge, indispensable part of what makes it enjoyable. Squirt is seen as female orgasm fluid, as an expression of ecstasy, with its own unique qualities. Squirt is a pleasant experience for all involved.
In summary, squirt is a fluid that is only produced through physical mechanics unique to arousal, and under very specific circumstances and motivations by some women. It is nothing at all like urine, and is both chemically and experientially different. It is absurd to call it “urine,” or “pee,” due to that being very confusing, and a waste of time, since it necessitates further explanation. Refusing to use the wellknown existing convention of calling one squirt, and the other pee is irrational, obstinate and counterproductive.
For all intents and purposes of normal life, experience, and speech, squirt is one thing, and pee is another.
1.) Zlatko Pastor, Roman Chmel. Female ejaculation and squirting as similar but completely different phenomena: A narrative review of current research. 2022
2.) Florian Wimpissinger, Christopher Springer, Walter Stackl. International online survey: female ejaculation has a positive impact on women’s and their partners’ ual lives. 2013
3.) Gary Schubach. Urethral Expulsions During Sensual Arousal and Bladder Catheterization in Seven Human Females. 2001
4.) Samuel Salama, Florence Boitrelle, Amélie Gauquelin, Lydia Malagrida, Nicolas Thiounn, Pierre Desvaux. Nature and origin of “squirting” in female uality. 2015
ero
